On 07.11.2025 06:32 Vasilenko Eduard <[email protected]> wrote:
> 3. My message was not that "IPv4 is enough". The shortage of IPv4 > addresses is real. My message was that IPv6 design is so bad (on the > subnet level) that businesses would stay on IPv4. Businesses stay on that because they don't want change. This applies to operating system versions and protocols. Remember when most businesses transferred HTTP traffic without TLS? It was Google that made that mandatory, so they implemented it. Same applies for SPF and DKIM. It existed more than 10 years and when Google and other big player made it mandatory, the businesses hurried up and implemented it. If Google ever decides to make IPv6 a criteria for page rank, businesses will implement that very fast. -- kind regards Marco Send spam to [email protected]
pgp0UP0X7Pnpc.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/3JNFOYGESX2IGJDYG7I7VPFQ2TGPVOVV/
