Why?!?
> -----Original Message----- > From: Marco Moock via NANOG <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2025 10:13 > To: North American Network Operators Group <[email protected]> > Cc: Marco Moock <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: IPv6 Performance (was Re: IPv4 Pricing) > > Am 03.12.2025 um 06:59:51 Uhr schrieb Vasilenko Eduard: > > > Wrong math. The internet average packet size is very close to 750B - > > it has been published many times in many places. > > > > Wrong assumption about the user needs. User does not care about > > serialization time. He/she cares about FCT==Flow Completion Time. If > > one would get 2.6% less on the bottleneck, then his FCT would be 2.6% > > longer. His page would open later. His file would download later. > > Your theoretical arguments have been discussed many times, it is now boring. > > The real experience shows that IPv6 is faster in certain real existing > environments like cellular networks (many people use them even at home) or > DS-Lite. I've also experienced overloaded CGNAT. The shorter header is almost > irrelevant in practice. > > -- > Gruß > Marco > > Send unsolicited bulk mail to [email protected] _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/GV7D5OUZZWAY5SIZ5I72RGPCDKSEAOZW/
