Let me elaborate. I thought Steve was concerned about the limited writablity of flash. My thought was to build something like a Linux router, you'd have to load the OS into a RAMdisk (or something similar), and only write to flash when the config changed. Which means you'd need some sort of singular configuration file. But I was wrong. :) He meant "read-only" *back to lurk mode* -- jb At 02:49 PM 5/23/2002 -0700, Dan Hollis wrote: >And making it *write-only* as the original poster asked, would fix things >how?
- Re: list problems? Andy Dills
- Re: list problems? Randy Bush
- Re: list problems? jlewis
- Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? Vinny Abello
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? E.B. Dreger
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? Steven J. Sobol
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? Dan Hollis
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? Steven J. Sobol
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? Jake Baillie
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? Dan Hollis
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? Jake Baillie
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? Steven J. Sobol
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? Scott Francis
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? Alex Rubenstein
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? Kevin Day
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? E.B. Dreger
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? Steven J. Sobol
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? Dave Israel
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? E.B. Dreger
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? Dan Hollis
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? Steven J. Sobol