I see the same from AS 16517 -
*> 205.139.72.0 216.177.55.5 500 15076 701 3561 23037 {80,109,122,... Note that our paths diverge after AS 23037 Could IMC Internet (ASN-IMC-BGP) be the source of the problem. Regards Marshall Eubanks Mike Lewinski wrote: > Of course it would be towards the end of the table. > > Here's a sample of the more detailed log at http://www.rockynet.com/wtf.html > > *>i205.139.72.0 a.b.c.d 101 0 3561 23037 > {1239,1785,2379,4323,4513,4546,4969,5006,5676,5778,6181,6253,6347,6395,6453, > 6580,6993,7132,7795,10242,10346,10492,10625,10674,10726,10851,10910,10937,10 > 957,11101,11134,11169,11589,11657,11853,12094,12156,12163,12175,12221,13350, > 13371,13443,13488,13568,13576,13578,13641,13790,13815,13882,14021,14130,1428 > 9,14359,14381,14452,14549,14564,14677,14685,14929,14990,15062,15150,15214,15 > 215,16477,16504,16554,16597,16631,16640,16707,16782,16852,16980,17033,17060, > 17253,17304,18480,18548,18565,18618,18862,18866,18903,18957,19019,19024,1954 > 1,19746,19893,20045,20303,20316,20357,20458,21536,21591,21715,21822,21853,22 > 191,22219,22242,22299,22319,22389,22406,22476,22728,22764,22912,22960,23195, > 23269,23306,23365,25639,25707,25905,26004} ? > > * i a.b.c.d 101 0 3561 23037 > {1239,1785,2379,4323,4513,4546,4969,5006,5676,5778,6181,6253,6347,6395,6453, > 6580,6993,7132,7795,10242,10346,10492,10625,10674,10726,10851,10910,10937,10 > 957,11101,11134,11169,11589,11657,11853,12094,12156,12163,12175,12221,13350, > 13371,13443,13488,13568,13576,13578,13641,13790,13815,13882,14021,14130,1428 > 9,14359,14381,14452,14549,14564,14677,14685,14929,14990,15062,15150,15214,15 > 215,16477,16504,16554,16597,16631,16640,16707,16782,16852,16980,17033,17060, > 17253,17304,18480,18548,18565,18618,18862,18866,18903,18957,19019,19024,1954 > 1,19746,19893,20045,20303,20316,20357,20458,21536,21591,21715,21822,21853,22 > 191,22219,22242,22299,22319,22389,22406,22476,22728,22764,22912,22960,23195, > 23269,23306,23365,25639,25707,25905,26004} ? > > > * e.f.g.h 25 0 701 3561 23037 > {1239,1785,2379,4323,4513,4546,4969,5006,5676,5778,6181,6253,6347,6395,6453, > 6580,6993,7132,7795,10242,10346,10492,10625,10674,10726,10851,10910,10937,10 > 957,11101,11134,11169,11589,11657,11853,12094,12156,12163,12175,12221,13350, > 13371,13443,13488,13568,13576,13578,13641,13790,13815,13882,14021,14130,1428 > 9,14359,14381,14452,14549,14564,14677,14685,14929,14990,15062,15150,15214,15 > 215,16477,16504,16554,16597,16631,16640,16707,16782,16852,16980,17033,17060, > 17253,17304,18480,18548,18565,18618,18862,18866,18903,18957,19019,19024,1954 > 1,19746,19893,20045,20303,20316,20357,20458,21536,21591,21715,21822,21853,22 > 191,22219,22242,22299,22319,22389,22406,22476,22728,22764,22912,22960,23195, > 23269,23306,23365,25639,25707,25905,26004} ? > > > neighbor ids's are munged, otherwise it's a straight dump of what we're > getting. I've gotten two other confirmations as well. > > Mike > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mike Lewinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 9:46 AM > Subject: AS path fugliness? > > > >>Anyone else receiving huge as-path (more than 125) causing these: >> >>Jul 3 08:23:06 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for >>aspath, requested size 268 >>Jul 3 08:23:46 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for >>aspath, requested size 270 >>Jul 3 08:27:45 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for >>aspath, requested size 274 >>Jul 3 08:31:59 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for >>aspath, requested size 268 >>Jul 3 08:41:02 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for >>aspath, requested size 268 >>Jul 3 08:41:43 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for >>aspath, requested size 270 >>Jul 3 08:57:56 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for >>aspath, requested size 268 >>Jul 3 09:04:04 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for >>aspath, requested size 268 >>Jul 3 09:10:01 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for >>aspath, requested size 268 >>Jul 3 09:10:52 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for >>aspath, requested size 270 >>Jul 3 09:17:40 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for >>aspath, requested size 268 >> >>(per http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/35.shtml ) >> >>It started just after local Qwest routes apparently recovered from some >> > kind > >>of nose-dive. We're still sorting through the tables trying to find out >> > who, > >>thus far longest I've found is about 20. >> >>Mike >> >> >> >> > -- Regards Marshall Eubanks This e-mail may contain confidential and proprietary information of Multicast Technologies, Inc, subject to Non-Disclosure Agreements T.M. Eubanks Multicast Technologies, Inc 10301 Democracy Lane, Suite 410 Fairfax, Virginia 22030 Phone : 703-293-9624 Fax : 703-293-9609 e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.multicasttech.com Test your network for multicast : http://www.multicasttech.com/mt/ Status of Multicast on the Web : http://www.multicasttech.com/status/index.html