On Thu, 25 Jul 2002 10:48:36 EDT, Petr Swedock said: > The courts. There is no possible way that this bill (as I > read it) could, in any way, be conceived as even remotely > constitutional. This is pure vigilante: the entertainment
The fact that a law is unconstitutional on the face of it has rarely stopped it in the past - that's why the courts have the authority to throw out bad laws. Unfortunately, we better be ready for several years of pain while a test case makes it way up the judicial pecking order...
msg04030/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
