Do people really almost get fired for what they write here? I'd think there would be more constructive things to do by management than read nanog for questionable posts. If I were managing someone and they posted their feeling on a subject and clearly said it was their own who am I to have a problem with that. It might be in my best interest and listen to them then silence them.
On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Ukyo Kuonji wrote: > > Sorry, but there are valid reasons for posting anonymously. As one person > that almost got fired from a company for expressing what was clearly marked > as his own opinion to this list, I can attest to this. Some employers are > concerned that you post during working hours, some are concerned that you > use a work address, some are concerned that anything you say, no matter what > email you use, will be considered as representations of the company's > direction, even if it is clearly marked as not. > > I like helping and sharing my opinions, but I'm not willing to loose my job > over it. > > UK > > >Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:13:22 -0400 (EDT) > >From: Brian Wallingford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Perhaps it's time to bar posting privileges from those who insist on > >remaining entirely anonymous? > > > >I doubt that anyone who has anything substantive to offer would need to > >use a hushmail/yahoo/etc. return address. > > > >The initial posts from Bandy, Vaul, et al were mildly amusing at first, > >but the novelty wore out very quickly. > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com >
