On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Tim Thorne wrote: > I'm not even sure if shutting listen4ever down is on the RIAA agenda. > Wouldn't the easiest course of action be to file suit against Verisign > and have their DNS nuked? that would be the logical approach. or they could get an order against the usg and block it at A.root-servers. no need to bring in a private company when the usg root can block all queries to it. the best approach may be to hit the usg dept of commerce with the order - they control the root. it maybe difficult for verisign as the registrar for listen4ever.com is MELBOURNE IT, so the US government maybe the fast track method to square this. regards joe baptista
- Major Labels v. Backbones John Ferriby
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Richard A Steenbergen
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones blitz
- Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v.... Sean Donelan
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major L... senthil ayyasamy
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major L... Marshall Eubanks
- RE: Dave Farber comments on Re: Maj... Deepak Jain
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re... Stephen Stuart
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Maj... Tim Thorne
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Joe Baptista
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Tim Thorne
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Ralph Doncaster
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Petri Helenius
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Tim Thorne
- Anyone from Prodigy or L3 list... Richard Forno
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Jeff Ogden
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Stephen J. Wilcox
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Greg Maxwell
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones JC Dill