This is obviously a "great truth" - a statement whose opposite is also true.
Regards and Best Wishes
Marshall Eubanks
On Tuesday, December 24, 2002, at 03:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 10:26:09 EST, Richard Forno said:A case could be made that you had it right the first time, in that a "largeIn my last post when I said this:If something's deemed 'critical' to a large segment of the population, thenI meant to say that security must ALWAYS outweigh convienience.
security must NEVER outweigh conveinience. Period. Non-negotiable.
My goof....guess I had too much NOG and not enough NAN at the party last
night. :)
segment" of the population cares less about security than they do about dancing
hamsters, and that they'd designate the latter as "critical". Thus the sorry
state of certain end-user software on 90% of the desktops.
Happy Holidays! ;)
<mime-attachment>