On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Richard Forno wrote: > In my last post when I said this: > > If something's deemed 'critical' to a large segment of the population, then > > security must NEVER outweigh conveinience. Period. Non-negotiable. > > I meant to say that security must ALWAYS outweigh convienience.
Sigh, people are playing games with words to force false choices. Of course its negotiable because the act of defining something "critical" is a negotiation.
