On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Todd A. Blank wrote: > I continue to agree that moving critical resources (see below) to these > new blocks is the best approach I have seen or heard in the months since > I made the original post. This approach punishes the clueless instead > of the people that already know what the problem is (and have to live > with it every day)
After this 69.0.0.0/8 thing is sorted out I guess we can move the "critical resources" over to 202.0.0.0/7 to track down all the idiots blocking that range (trying to decide if I should put a smilie here). I nominate the arin.net nameservers. Could someone publish a name of a valid resource (or even pingable ip) in 69/8 space? This would allow people to test their (and their upsteams) filters quickly while we wait for the list to come out. -- Simon Lyall. | Newsmaster | Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Network/System Admin | Postmaster | Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ihug Ltd, Auckland, NZ | Asst Doorman | Web: http://www.darkmere.gen.nz