On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Ben Browning wrote: > >This is, in fact (for you nanae watchers), the reason that most of them > >get canceled by us FASTER... Sadly, non-payment is often a quicker and > >easier method to term a customer than 'abuse', less checks since there > >is no 'percieved revenue' :( > > A revenue check has no place in abuse terminations.
That would be nice, but this is the real world. We (presumably technical people) don't get to make all of the choices in life. If we did, things might be a lot better, but then again maybe only 10-15% of us would still be employed :)
