ICANN has no right to claim that they are the authority for the namespace. They are NOT. Also note the word PUBLIC in PUBLIC-ROOT.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Joe Shen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "NANGO" <nanog@merit.edu> Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 9:12 PM Subject: Re: Enable BIND cache server to resolve chinese domain name? > > > > Hi, > > > > Some of our customer complaint they could not visit > > back to their web site, which use chinese domain name. > > I google the net and found some one recommend to use > > public-root.com servers in hint file. > > > > I found domain name like xn--8pru44h.xn--55qx5d could > > not be resolved either. > > > > Our cache server runs BIND9.3.1 with root server list > > from rs.internic.net. > > > > Do I need to modify our cache server configuration to > > enable it? > > > > regards > > > > Joe > > Only if you wish to do all your other customers a disfavour > by configuring your caching servers to support a private > namespace then yes. > > I would have thought the Site Finder experience would have > stopped people from thinking that they can arbitarially add > names to to the public DNS. > > Mark > -- > Mark Andrews, ISC > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >