On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> > On 10-aug-2005, at 2:54, Randy Bush wrote: > > > on this side of the puddles, i think most folk use /126s for p2p > > links. > > this has been endlessly and loudly debated, but it still seems > > extremely > > strange to use 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 addresses for a p2p link. > > Well, if you want to be really environmentally conscious, do away > with that /126 too and just use link-locals, with a single global > address per router for management and the generation of ICMPs. and you ping the customer links how? (or did I miss the point of the link-locals?)