-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 31, 2007, at 9:16 PM, Mark Foster wrote:
list... I talked to my lawyer. And while I am not a lawyer, I can
tell you that my lawyer pointed out several interesting legal
theories under which I could have some serious liability, and so I
don't do that any more. (As an example, consider what happens *to
you* if a hospital stops getting emailed results back from their
outside laboratory service because their "email firewall" is
checking your server, and someone dies as a result of the delay)
So while I think you'd be justified in doing it, I think you'd
find that 1) lots of people wouldn't change their configs at all,
and 2) you might find that your liability insurance doesn't cover
deliberate acts.
Uhm. I don't follow?
I my experience, people who tell stories like this really just need
to get a better lawyer. I've had several lawyers contact us on
things about this lame and have found that that the one sentence
reply letter is often the most effective:
Dear Sir:
Kiss my what?
Never hear from them again.
Chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFFwV6ZElUlCLUT2d0RArP9AKC4JaEP5QJiB70SfrCWGkI9eTdxBwCcC+wA
+DFKKXKMUqluFDF1DNCBJ0o=
=sndk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----