On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Randy Bush wrote: > > > the average number of v4 prefixes per AS is ~10, and it's rising. In > > v6, the goal is that every PI site can use a single prefix**, meaning > > the v6 routing table will be at least one (and two or even three > > eventually) orders of magnitude smaller than the v4 one. > > how much of the v4 prefix count is de-aggregation for te or by TWits? > why won't they do this in v6? wee, lookie! redistribute connected it still works! :)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted David W. Hankins
- Re: DHCPv6 and stateless autoconf, was: NANO... Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted Tony Hain
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush
- dual-stack [was: NANOG 40 agenda posted] Patrick W. Gilmore
- Re: dual-stack simon
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Larry J. Blunk
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Stephen Sprunk
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Kradorex Xeron
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda pos... Randy Bush
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Joel Jaeggli
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Paul Vixie
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Petri Helenius
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Paul Vixie
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Stephen Sprunk
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl