On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Randy Bush wrote: > >> how much of the v4 prefix count is de-aggregation for te or by TWits? > >> why won't they do this in v6? > > wee, lookie! redistribute connected > > whee! lookie! minds disconnected, at least from public good. Yes :( sadly I suspect that is not the only mistake/misconfig/malconfig happening in the world :(
- Re: DHCPv6 and stateless autoconf, was: NANOG 40... Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted Tony Hain
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush
- dual-stack [was: NANOG 40 agenda posted] Patrick W. Gilmore
- Re: dual-stack simon
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Larry J. Blunk
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Stephen Sprunk
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Kradorex Xeron
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Joel Jaeggli
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Paul Vixie
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Petri Helenius
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Paul Vixie
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Stephen Sprunk
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Paul Vixie
