> ;. IN NS > A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 IN A 198.41.0.4 > B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 IN A 192.228.79.201 > C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 IN A 192.33.4.12 > D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 IN A 128.8.10.90 > E.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 IN A 192.203.230.10 > F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 IN A 192.5.5.241 > G.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 IN A 192.112.36.4 > H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 IN A 128.63.2.53 > I.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 IN A 192.36.148.17 > J.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 IN A 192.58.128.30 > K.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 IN A 193.0.14.129 > L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 IN A 198.32.64.12 > M.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 IN A 202.12.27.33 > > > I don't see any v6 glue there... Rather than having conversations about > transition to IPv6, maybe we should be sure it works natively first? It's > rather ironic to think that for v6 DNS to work an incumbent legacy protocol is > still required.
At least something is happening: http://www.icann.org/committees/security/sac016.htm http://www.icann.org/committees/security/sac017.htm Regards, Andras