On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:32:39 PDT, Jim Shankland said: > *No* security gain? No protection against port scans from Bucharest? > No protection for a machine that is used in practice only on the > local, office LAN? Or to access a single, corporate Web site?
Nope. Zip. Zero. Ziltch. Nothing over and above what a good properly configured stateful *non*-NAT firewall should be doing for you already.
pgpjn0l9Whgt3.pgp
Description: PGP signature