On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:32:39 PDT, Jim Shankland said:
> *No* security gain?  No protection against port scans from Bucharest?
> No protection for a machine that is used in practice only on the
> local, office LAN?  Or to access a single, corporate Web site?

Nope. Zip. Zero. Ziltch.  Nothing over and above what a good properly
configured stateful *non*-NAT firewall should be doing for you already.


Attachment: pgpjn0l9Whgt3.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to