On Tue, 6 May 2008 01:19:36 +0700
Roland Dobbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On May 6, 2008, at 12:59 AM, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
>
> > If not, what should the criteria be for an "official" note of the
> > paper?
>
>
> Perhaps it's an oversimplification, but can't those who wish to
> publish such information simply deliver their papers at a NANOG
> meeting (after acceptance by the Program Committee, which acts as a
> gate), and then the NANOG folks post the documents along with any
> slides and the VoDs of their presentations, in the usual fashion?
>
That's certainly one very good answer. Are there others?
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
NANOG@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
