<apply hip waders> Please keep the political rhetoric off-list, thanks. </apply hip waders>
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Jeroen Massar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > As everybody is a big fan of securing their networks against foreign > attacks, be aware that the US DoD has been assigned 14 /22's, IPv6 that > is, not IPv4, they all come from a single IPv6 /13 though, which is what > they apparently asked for in the beginning, at least that was the rumor, > well they got what they wanted. > So, someone else pointed out that the DoD isn't one org, really. There are several groups/orgs under DoD, there are several groups nested under each of those groups, and depending upon the network architecture/topology used it's fully possible that one route announcement isn't practical for this Org. What I think we should worry about is a larger portion of that Org with a large enough part of one of the /22's doing something silly like: "redistribute connected" ... (which they could, of course, have done with any/all of their /8's -> /16's in ipv4 as well...) -Chris _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog