> On Apr 26, 2019, at 6:10 AM, Matthew Kaufman <matt...@matthew.at> wrote: > > So providers should stamp this out (because it is “bad”) and support > customers who are running TOR nodes (because those are “good”). Did I get > that right? If that is how you see it, then it's right for you. At no time did I mention TOR, nor will I get dragged into that discussion. Anne Attorney at Law GDPR, CCPA (CA) & CCDPA (CO) Compliance Consultant Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law) Legislative Consultant CEO/President, Institute for Social Internet Public Policy Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange Board of Directors, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop Legal Counsel: The CyberGreen Institute Former Counsel: Mail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS California Bar Association Cal. Bar Cyberspace Law Committee Colorado Cyber Committee Ret. Professor of Law, Lincoln Law School of San Jose
- Re: Packetstream - how does this not violate just a... Job Snijders
- Re: Packetstream - how does this not violate j... Mark Seiden
- Re: Packetstream - how does this not viola... John Levine
- Re: Packetstream - how does this not v... K. Scott Helms
- Re: Packetstream - how does this n... Tom Beecher
- Re: Packetstream - how does t... Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
- RE: Packetstream - how do... adamv0025
- Re: Packetstream - how do... Matthew Kaufman
- Re: Packetstream - how do... Tom Beecher
- Re: Packetstream - how do... Mike Hammett
- Re: Packetstream - how do... Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
- Re: Packetstream - how do... Mel Beckman
- Re: Packetstream - how do... Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
- Re: Packetstream - how do... Mel Beckman
- Re: Packetstream - how do... Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
- Re: Packetstream - how do... William Herrin
- My .sig (Was Re: Packetst... Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
- Re: My .sig (Was Re: Pack... Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
- Re: My .sig (Was Re: Pack... Ross Tajvar
- Re: My .sig (Was Re: Pack... Tom Beecher
- Re: Packetstream - how does t... Mark Seiden