Not having available for use, yes. But mandating it? On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 3:58 AM Yang Yu <yang.yu.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 4:17 AM Keith Medcalf <kmedc...@dessus.com> wrote: > > I am curious -- what exactly are those "obvious reasons"? (And for the > > record HTTP *IS* being used, it is just being tunneled inside a TLS > > connection). > > For a popular site, it would be doing a disservice to its customers by > not using HTTPS, even for static content. > > https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/foci15/foci15-paper-marczak.pdf
-- Jeff Shultz Central Office Technician SCTC (503) 769-2125 Go Big Ask for Gig -- Like us on Social Media for News, Promotions, and other information!! <https://www.facebook.com/SCTCWEB/> <https://www.instagram.com/sctc_503/> <https://www.yelp.com/biz/sctc-stayton-3> <https://www.youtube.com/c/sctcvideos> _**** This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. ****_
