On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 02:50:58PM -0500, Todd Underwood wrote:
> and just to check one thing...
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 2:33 PM Daniel Sterling <sterling.dan...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I don't particularly *want* to block or advocate blocking QUIC, but if
> > I keep hitting the issue and can't help people troubleshoot, what
> > other sane option have I?
> >
>
> i don't think you've addressed the "replace your broken ISP" action that is
> clearly sane and would fix this, right?
>
> i'm assuming that this is not an option to get a functional IP layer?
often one has to live in the world of reality. if google is very worried about
the broadband experience they can continue to invest in this space and
challenges.
it seems the corporate overlords has led it to not continue to persue this
option.
it's hard to have it both ways, wanting unlimited UDP, low cost (free?) ports
for
bits, etc..
there's natural dynamics at play here with business interests that haven't quite
balanced out yet. perhaps the LTE/5G overlay will replace fixed broadband at
home
with managed CPE from the cellular providers.
if the question is will the browser vendor (google) or the broadband provider
(att)
move first, i can already predict the answer. my experience (again) with the
quic
wg is they seem to think there's many options and bad providers will be replaced
which seems disconnected from reality.
- jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
