> On Jun 10, 2020, at 6:40 PM, brad dreisbach <br...@us.ntt.net> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 12:01:38AM +0200, Baldur Norddahl wrote: >> Am I correct in assuming loose mode RPF only drops packets from unannounced >> address space in the global routing table? And the downside of doing so is >> that sometimes we do receive packets from that address space, usually back >> scatter from traceroute or other ICMP messages. > > uRPF absolutely kills the pps performance or your hardware due to the packet > having to be recirculated to do the check(at least this is the case on every > platform that ive ever tested it on). use acl's to protect your edge. > > -b Completely agree for edge scenario 100%. And now for Bill to talk down to me…. :/
- Re: Partial vs Full t... Baldur Norddahl
- Re: Partial vs Fu... William Herrin
- Re: Partial vs Fu... Chris Adams
- Re: Partial vs Fu... Robert Blayzor
- RE: Partial vs Fu... Brian Turnbow via NANOG
- Re: Partial vs Fu... brad dreisbach
- Re: Partial vs Fu... William Herrin
- RE: Partial vs Fu... Drew Weaver
- Re: Partial vs Fu... Saku Ytti
- RE: Partial vs Fu... Drew Weaver
- Re: Partial vs Fu... Brian Johnson
- Re: Partial vs Full t... Brian Johnson
- Re: Partial vs Fu... William Herrin
- Re: Partial vs Fu... Brian Johnson
- Re: Partial vs Fu... William Herrin
- Re: Partial vs Fu... Brian Johnson
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mark Tinka
- RE: Partial vs Full tables Michael Hare via NANOG
- Re: Partial vs Full t... Mark Tinka
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Baldur Norddahl