On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 18:08, Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote: > > Hi all. > > When the whole SR concept was being first dreamed up, I was mildly excited > about it. But then real life happened and global deployment (be it basic > SR-MPLS or SRv6) is what it is, and I became less excited. This was back in > 2015. > > All the talk about LDPv6 this and last week has had me reflecting a great > deal on where we are, as an industry, in why we are having to think about SR > and all its incarnations. > > So, let me be the one that stirs up the hornets' nest... > > Why do we really need SR? Be it SR-MPLS or SRv6 or SRv6+?
I am clearly very far behind on my emails, but of the emails I've read so far in this thread though you have mentioned at least twice: On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 18:08, Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote: > What I am less enthused about is being forced On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 23:22, Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote: > it tastes funny when you are forced Mark, does someone have a gun to your head? Are you in trouble? Blink 63 times for yes, 64 times for no ;) Cheers, James.
