On 8/Sep/20 22:02, Tom Beecher via NANOG wrote: > I also get that intent from the OP. However I disagree that there > should be a 'de facto' standard created for such things. All flavors > of BGP community specifications are designed to be flexible so that > different networks can design a system that is tailored to their needs. > > Having 'de facto' standards does not simplify in my opinion. I > believe it just creates more work for operators trying to navigate > around different opinions of what 'de facto' means. Indeed. Consider a new ISP starting operations in Myanmar, with little or no global peering, having to wade through tons of information to design their BGP community structure based on a "de facto" standard defined by a group of ISP's half-way around the world. What's the real value? Mark.
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 i... Mark Tinka via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-facto "no-e... Owen DeLong
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-facto "no-export... Tom Beecher via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-facto "no-e... Mike Hammett via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-facto "... Tom Beecher via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-facto &q... Mike Hammett via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-fact... Tom Beecher via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de... Mike Hammett via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 i... Mike Hammett via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-fact... Owen DeLong
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-facto &q... Mark Tinka via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-fact... Mike Hammett via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de... Mark Tinka via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 i... Mike Hammett via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 i... Mark Tinka via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 i... Mike Hammett via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 i... Mark Tinka via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 i... Mike Hammett via NANOG
- Re: BGP Community - AS0 i... Mark Tinka via NANOG
- Re: [External] Re: BGP Co... Hunter Fuller
- Re: [External] Re: BGP Co... Mark Tinka