> On Feb 18, 2021, at 8:38 AM, Steve Saner <ssa...@ideatek.com> wrote: > > We are starting to look at CGNAT solutions. The primary motivation at the > moment is to extend current IPv4 resources, but IPv6 migration is also a > factor.
IPv6 Migration is generally not aided by CGNAT. In general, the economics today still work out to make purchasing or leasing addresses more favorable than CGNAT. It’s a bit dated by now, but still very relevant, see Lee Howard’s excellent research presented at the 2012 Rocky mountain v6 task force meeting: https://www.rmv6tf.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/TCO-of-CGN1.pdf <https://www.rmv6tf.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/TCO-of-CGN1.pdf> Owen > We've been in touch with A10. Just wondering if there are some alternative > vendors that anyone would recommend. We'd probably be looking at a solution > to support 5k to 15k customers and bandwidth up to around 30-40 gig as a > starting point. A solution that is as transparent to user experience as > possible is a priority. > > Thanks > > -- > Steve Saner > ideatek HUMAN AT OUR VERY FIBER > This email transmission, and any documents, files or previous email messages > attached to it may contain confidential information. If the reader of this > message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible > for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified > that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is > strictly prohibited. If you are not, or believe you may not be, the intended > recipient, please advise the sender immediately by return email or by calling > 620.543.5026 <tel:620.543.5026>. Then take all steps necessary to permanently > delete the email and all attachments from your computer system. >
