Absolutely. I hate those web based forums, they force me to do all
kinds of things that Email lists don't force me to do and the
interfaces between them are often clunky or don't work. Keep it
simple, please.
On Sat, 20 Mar 2021 16:41:22 -0400,
Shawn L via NANOG wrote:
>
> [1 <text/plain; UTF-8 (quoted-printable)>]
>
> Agreed. Don't fix what isn't broken.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Mark Tinka" <mark@tinka.africa>
> Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2021 4:33pm
> To: "Randy Bush" <ra...@psg.com>, "Rod Beck" <rod.b...@unitedcablecompany.com>
> Cc: "North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog@nanog.org>
> Subject: Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG
> list...?
>
>
>
>
> On 3/20/21 20:06, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> > i do not find the volume or diversity on the nanog list problematic.
> > in fact, i suspect its diversity and openness are major factors in
> > it being the de facto global anything-ops list. perhaps we do not
> > need to fix that.
>
> Simple. As. That.
>
> Mark.
>
> [2 <text/html; UTF-8 (quoted-printable)>]
--
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is:
How do
you spend it?
John Covici wb2una
cov...@ccs.covici.com
