Since FiOS still doesn't do ipv6 (I don't bother checking anymore) I've used tunnelbroker since I was stuck on Comcast. I'm not running BGP since that's overkill for my home lab needs. just a tunnel with the /64 they give you and an addition /48.
If I have to renumber, there are maybe just 4-5 places where an ipv6 is manually set. I'll just setup a new tunnel and change the router advertisement settings. - J On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 4:53 AM <b...@uu3.net> wrote: > So, I assume you have PI IPv6 space and doing BGP with HE? > In other case, if anything will happen to HE (they close they > tunnelbroker service) you will have to renumber. > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > > From: Javier J <jav...@advancedmachines.us> > To: b...@uu3.net > Cc: nanog <nanog@nanog.org> > Subject: Re: 10 years from now... (was: internet futures) > Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:57:20 -0400 > > I've had an IPV6 tunnel from Hurricane Electric for 10+ years I think. > IPv4 will probably live as it does now in my network, mostly for management > / interserver coms for legacy hardware/software that doesn't support ipv6. > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 5:31 PM <b...@uu3.net> wrote: > > > Oh, sorry to disappoint you, but they are not missing anything.. > > Internet become a consumer product where data is provided by > > large corporations similary to TV now. Your avarage Joe consumer > > does NOT care about NAT and that he cant run services or he does NOT > > have full e2e communication. > > > > Yes, you are right, NAT was a second class internet for a while but > > now it seems that we cannot live without it anymore :) > > I dont really see other way how I can connect LAN to internet now. > > Using public IPs? Thats so terrible idea. How can I be el-cheappo > > dual-homed then? > > > > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > > > > From: Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> > > To: Andy Ringsmuth <a...@andyring.com> > > Cc: Grant Taylor via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> > > Subject: Re: 10 years from now... (was: internet futures) > > Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 08:00:38 +1100 > > > > There are more smart phones in use in the world today the world than can > > be > > addressed by IPv4. Complaining about lack of IPv6 deployment has been > > legitimate for a long time. Telcos shouldn˙˙t have to deploy NATs. Homes > > shouldn˙˙t have to deploy NATs. Businesses shouldn˙˙t have to deploy > NATs. > > > > NATs produce a second class Internet. We have had to lived with a second > > class Internet for so long that most don˙˙t know what they are missing. > -- > > Mark Andrews > > >
