What irked me today was an equipment manufacturer. I found out because Google 
had some issues handling ICMP to their DNS resolvers today and some of my 
devices started spazzing out. 


There's no reason this manufacturer doesn't just setup a variety their own 
servers to handle this, other than being lazy. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Mark Delany" <k...@november.emu.st> 
To: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org> 
Sent: Tuesday, February 8, 2022 5:13:30 PM 
Subject: Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging 

On 08Feb22, Mike Hammett allegedly wrote: 

> Some people need a clue by four and I'm looking to build my collection of 
> them. 

> "Google services, including Google Public DNS, are not designed as ICMP 
> network testing services" 

Hard to disagree with "their network, their rules", but we're talking about an 
entrenched, 
pervasive, Internet-wide behaviorial issue. 

My guess is that making ping/ICMP less reliable to the extent that it becomes 
unusable 
wont change fundamental behavior. Rather, it'll make said "pingers" reach for 
another tool 
that does more or less the same thing with more or less as little extra effort 
as possible 
on their part. 

And what might such an alternate tool do? My guess is one which SYN/ACKs 
various popular 
TCP ports (say 22, 25, 80, 443) and maybe sends a well-formed UDP packet to a 
few popular 
DNS ports (say 53 and 119). Let's call this command "nmap -sn" with a few 
tweaks, shall 
we? 

After all, it's no big deal to the pinger if their reachability command now 
exchanges 
10-12 packets with resource intensive destination ports instead of a couple of 
packets to 
lightweight destinations. I'll bet most pingers will neither know nor care, 
especially if 
their next-gen ping works more consistently than the old one. 

So. Question. Will making ping/ICMP mostly useless for home-gamers and lazy 
network admins 
change internet behaviour for the better? Or will it have unintended 
consequences such as 
an evolutionary adaptation by the tools resulting in yet more unwanted traffic 
which is 
even harder to eliminate? 


Mark. 

Reply via email to