> On Apr 7, 2022, at 07:25 , John Curran <jcur...@arin.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 7 Apr 2022, at 2:08 AM, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com 
>> <mailto:o...@delong.com>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Indeed - you only emphasize why it is important for organizations to get 
>>> involved in ARIN’s governance…  It is not intended that your sole 
>>> interaction with ARIN be via contractual mechanisms, but rather that 
>>> network operators actually participate as members of the organization.
>> 
>> Perhaps the only bright spot in the recent change to the fee structure is 
>> that I now have membership open to me without having to pay an extra 
>> $500/year for the privilege.
>> 
>> Prior to this most recent change, end-users were not afforded such 
>> participation.
>  
> Correct.
> 
>> Even with the most recent change, the board still opted to default all end 
>> users to second class citizenry unless they each took specific actions to 
>> opt in to participation in ARIN governance.
> 
> Correct as well - with the understanding that the “specific action” that one 
> needs to take is simply asking to be a General Member; i.e. confirming your 
> organization’s intent to vote in ARIN elections and acknowledging that your 
> organization will be publicly listed on the General Member list.   
> <https://www.arin.net/participate/oversight/membership/faq/ 
> <https://www.arin.net/participate/oversight/membership/faq/>> 
> 
> Having a record of such acknowledgement is desirable for record keeping 
> purposes, and yes, in theory we could have forced the entire 7000+ existing 
> ARIN general members on day one of the membership structure change to 
> undertake the exact same consent process in order to retain their General 
> Member status and be able to vote – but that would have been significant 
> member disenfranchisement for something that ARIN can just as easily obtain 
> for pre-existing general members on a rolling basis going forward.  
> 
> My apologies if the handling of this leaves with the impression of being “a 
> second class” citizen, as that was not intent at all (rather we are just 
> handling a very significant change in our membership structure in the most 
> pragmatic manner possible.) 

So this proactive registering to vote is being imposed on all new LIR 
organizations as well?

Owen

Reply via email to