On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 10:59, jordi.palet--- via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote:
> No, I’m not saying that. I’m saying "in actual deployments", which doesn’t > mean that everyone is deploying, we are missing many ISPs, we are missing > many enterprises. Because of low entropy of A-B pairs in bps volume, seeing massive amounts of IPv6 in IPv6 enabled networks is not indicative of IPv6 success. I don't disagree with your assertion, I just think it's damaging, because readers without context will form an idea that things are going smoothly. We should rightly be in panic mode and forget all the IPv4 extension crap and start thinking how do we ensure IPv6 happens and how do we ensure we get back to single stack Internet. IPv6 is very much an afterthought, a 2nd class citizen today. You can deploy new features and software without IPv6, and it's fine. IPv6 can be broken, and it's not an all-hands-on-deck problem, no one is calling. -- ++ytti
