I suppose that depends on the size (bits and miles) of the network and the cost of transport within it. In many areas, space + power + port is cheaper than transport.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Burke" <t...@mid.net> To: "Aaron Gould" <aar...@gvtc.com> Cc: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Saturday, April 6, 2024 10:00:05 PM Subject: Re: Netskrt - ISP-colo CDN I have been trying to get _away_ from caching appliances on our network — other than Google, we are able to pick up most of the stuff that otherwise would be cacheable via private peering; so it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense for us to have appliances in the datacenter taking up space, power, and 100G ports, and increasing potential attack surface by having devices that we cannot control directly connected to edge routers. > On Apr 4, 2024, at 2:57 PM, Aaron Gould <aar...@gvtc.com> wrote: > > Anyone out there using Netskrt CDN? I mean, installed in your network for > content delivery to your customers. I understand Netskrt provides caching for > some well known online video streaming services... just wondering if there > are any network operators that have worked with Netskrt and deployed their > caching servers in your networks and what have you thought about it? What > Internet uplink savings are you seeing? > > Netskrt - https://www.netskrt.io/ > > > -- > -Aaron >
