What /20 would this be, and can you blame an out of date whois client or whois db for it?
If the /20 is being routed, and announced - chances are it IS allocated. On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:40 AM, Leslie <les...@craigslist.org> wrote: > I failed to mention we're seeing this from an unallocated /20 whose parent > /8 is allocated to ARIN (and is partially in use) > > Leslie
