On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 03:34:10PM -0500, Martin Hannigan wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Christopher Morrow > <morrowc.li...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Richard Bennett <rich...@bennett.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Google will be all sweetness and light until they've crushed OpenDNS, > > > and when the competitor's out of the picture, they'll get down to the > > > monetizing. > > > > one note: OpenDNS is not the only 'competitor' here.... just one of > > the better obviously known ones. > > > > ie: > > 4.2.2.2 L(3) > > 198.6.1.1/2/3/4/5/122/142/146/195 ex-UU > > Neustar (can't recall ips, sorry) > > > > -chris > > > > > > > Why did Google put an infrastructure critical application into PA space? > >
whats PA space in this context? clearly 8.0.0.0/8 was allocated prior to any current group-think about what PA might be. --bill