On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:37 PM, <bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 03:34:10PM -0500, Martin Hannigan wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Christopher Morrow > > <morrowc.li...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Richard Bennett <rich...@bennett.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Google will be all sweetness and light until they've crushed > OpenDNS, > > > > and when the competitor's out of the picture, they'll get down to > the > > > > monetizing. > > > > > > one note: OpenDNS is not the only 'competitor' here.... just one of > > > the better obviously known ones. > > > > > > ie: > > > 4.2.2.2 L(3) > > > 198.6.1.1/2/3/4/5/122/142/146/195 ex-UU > > > Neustar (can't recall ips, sorry) > > > > > > -chris > > > > > > > > > > > > Why did Google put an infrastructure critical application into PA space? > > > > > > whats PA space in this context? clearly 8.0.0.0/8 was allocated > prior to any current group-think about what PA might be. > > --bill > Let's call it "conceptual PA". I'm simply asking why something that has the potential to impact all of us is being numbered into address space other than their own? And before the thinkpol start in, I'm referring to the v4 addresses and their status. It's a fair question since it has major impact on the net. If the store for legacy v4 addresses is open I'd like to know what street it's on. Best, -M< -- Martin Hannigan mar...@theicelandguy.com p: +16178216079 Power, Network, and Costs Consulting for Iceland Datacenters and Occupants
