On 2/10/2010 7:55 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > On Feb 10, 2010, at 3:55 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: >> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Jake Khuon wrote: >> >>> Excellent production.
I'll go with that. >> ... but still an advertisement for use of IXPs instead of private peering or >> alike. I'd say it contains several factual errors or at least omittance of >> important factors (settlement free peering in other ways than IXPs, for >> instance, is hardly mentioned). > > Could you point to a single factual error please? That is a serious charge > to just throw out without a single word to back up your claim. > > And no, "omittance of important factors" is not a "factual error" in a 5 > minute video of a wide and amazingly complex topic. > > Put another way: If you think you can do better, then let's see your video. That is definitely the best answer--if you don't like it, do one (at your expense of time and other resources) that you like better. I think I am probably a member of the target audience, and I though it was great (and recommended it to other folk). Amazing how many people there are that can't do it, but can find fault with those that can and do. -- "Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have." Remember: The Ark was built by amateurs, the Titanic by professionals. Requiescas in pace o email Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Eppure si rinfresca ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
