On 2010.03.04 22:26, Steve Bertrand wrote: > On 2010.03.04 16:53, William Herrin wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Stan Barber <s...@academ.com> wrote: >>>> On Mar 4, 2010, at 1:30 PM, William Herrin wrote: >>>> Because we expect far fewer end users to multihome tomorrow than do today? >>> >>> I would suggest that the ratio of folks that will multihome under IPv6 >>> versus those that won't will get smaller. I base that on an assumption that >>> NAT (as we know it today) will be less prevalent as IPv6 usage grows. >> >> Alrighty then... > > heh. > > Stan, you've got things backwards, no matter which direction you are > looking at things from. I'm thinking that you may have written the > sentence incorrectly. > > It's unfortunate, but it is reality. > > Have you reviewed your RIR policy lately? v6 will be flying out the > window soon, and your local RIR may be assigning PI space like candy. > > Welcome IPv6.
fwiw, it didn't appear clear to me that my own comments reflected my feelings that the migration was a good thing ;) STeve
