> On Mar 5, 2010, at 7:24 AM, William Herrin wrote: >> Joel made a remarkable assertion >> that non-aggregable assignments to end users, the ones still needed >> for multihoming, would go down under IPv6. I wondered about his >> reasoning. Stan then offered the surprising clarification that a >> reduction in the use of NAT would naturally result in a reduction of >> multihoming.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Stan Barber <s...@academ.com> wrote: > I was not trying to say there would be a reduction in multihoming. I was > trying to say that the rate of increase in non-NATed single-homing > would increase faster than multihoming. I guess I was not very clear. Hi Stan, Your logic still escapes me. Network-wise there's not a lot of difference between a single-homed IPv4 /32 and a single-homed IPv6 /56. Host-wise there may be a difference but why would you expect that to impact networks? Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004