On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Jack Bates wrote: > Web portals work fine, and honestly, it's not like you need to switch > subnets, either. PPPoE/A implementations work great, as they are already > designed to utilize radius backends to quickly alter static/dynamic on a > session. For bridging setups, you have a variety of implementations and it > becomes messier. Cisco, while maintaining RBE did away with the concept of > proxy-nd, and didn't provide a mechanism for dynamically allocating the > prefixes to the unnumbered interface. If you use dslam level controls, > you'll most likely being using DHCPv6 TA addressing with PD on top of it, > which works well. Most of which can support quick static/dynamic > capabilities as it does with v4.
Thanks. I will have a deeper look in the standards. This sounds like a viable solution to me. Albeit, I wonder if there is a drive for the big ISPs to implement such features.