On 8/19/10 5:30 AM, Joakim Aronius wrote:
> * Hannes Frederic Sowa (han...@mailcolloid.de) wrote:
>>
>> But most people just don't care. My proposal is to have some kind of
>> sane defaults for them e.g. changing their prefix every week or in the
>> case of a reconnect. This would mitigate some of the many privacy
>> concerns in the internet a little bit. Of course all the already known
>> problems would still exist. And still people have to care about the
>> technology to reach a higher level of anonymity.
> 
> Ok. Lets assume that the ISP hands out new prefixes to the clients CPE each 
> week. The CPE then advertises these prefixes on the clients home network. For 
> clients accessing the internet this works fine (except perhaps a glitch 
> during the switchover). 
> 
> But what about the internal communication in the customer premises? How do 
> they connect to their NAS, media players, printers, TVs etc? Of course there 
> is UPnP, DLNA and different other kinds of magic but I imagine that most home 
> users actually configure IP addresses at some point. 

manual configuration of ip address name mappings seems like a rather low
priority for the average home user...

I don't expect that will be a big activity in the future either, more
devices means less manual intervention not more.

> Constantly changing prefixes will ad another layer of complexity, things will 
> break, and customers will be upset. (and quite frankly I don't think that you 
> would gain that much privacy anyway) 
> 
> just my $.02
> 
> /Joakim
> 
> 


Reply via email to