-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 03/13/2011 05:34 PM, goe...@anime.net wrote: > On Sun, 13 Mar 2011, Alexander Maassen wrote: >> On 13-3-2011 18:31, William Allen Simpson wrote: >>> On 3/13/11 7:45 AM, Alexander Maassen wrote: >>>> Why o why are isp's and hosters so ignorant in dealing with such issues >>>> and act like they do not care? >>> So, part of the problem is *your* upstream. Why didn't your upstream >>> actively remove the entire abusive netblock? Why didn't your upstream >>> contact other providers with your evidence, and together remove the >>> abusive network from the global routing tables? >> My hoster did mail, his upstream is EGI, however, EGI does not want to >> block/filter since it would pollute their routers they say. >> I asked through my hoster if they would be willing to place a simple UDP >> filter, blocking all of it. They refuse. > > again make it a question of economics. > > vote with your wallet, vote with your feet. > > if they won't block, leave. >
leaving is not always as easy as you imply. There are some areas with only one real provider. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJNfUvcAAoJEPXCUD/44PWqje8QALqCB5SmUamIvItQSsJZ+B0t bKSDxmUszgAkFMxc9y7n1TuymOKx2lsCQmO8aQmE95NXOUloH1R89aA51DMaxxsX vt9GspDi2zuzoGngMUhl7Xuho5lxekg0nw8zEqa14MdZK/iMQw1e9D+pfl2GF43X 4KyFBqL85DrpnJhaNpQ3BB/EsM4+hMxxZYm5CAqZYKa2ywuR9LGVjQ5i0zoqc3e9 wFUAk2C/0ATf+eUhBaw6OHtpj7E2JgGfkP8K8npr27U9WVMpjBjd1ERZVy7FZ+7n rEVj+bUrW57VVvdv1UzE4rHa49Y0YXALnq05rGxuE0iCkIcth8pDI5YVYwTwsvDx gZR5H0Kmm9bQvOpvUR8TmW7BXlamVOHC1beCYHhI6Oig1bTx1DfCP+CniMnz5l3o G+sweZA589nJxonawl5qGhySCBg6a9Z4gtoYRaFsTVe8sI59JtzsbyvjdVvUwSkR UOPdPpHUuG72i3dB+/bdTKWDeGjghn6oTheVY/03oYvOLAg+8zZPupb3Ql9FARnw qb2Qc5ebzEG6wuaXlC/iHzTuc4DHp4rWvwm9tE1sQ379ntZJiKpfm0eMcdeo+xJ9 RxDg5fksOaihhM8MVRi4recdHyySzHZw9JPrx1VfhPWv3umPYt/csT0/L/EeyAJu Ybo7ahfzII26suzrAr43 =M/H6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----