On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: >> >> On Mar 30, 2011, at 10:26 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: >> >>> It also needs >>> >>> 1. Someone to complain to law enforcement >>> >> True, > > as has been brought up in the past here... some folk rely heavily upon > IRR data for route prefix filtering. if the object is in the IRR > database (with the right linkages), it gets permitted in router > filters automagically.
I forgot: $ whois -h whois.radb.net 148.163.0.0 route: 148.163.0.0/16 descr: /16 for Celanese origin: AS13767 mnt-by: DBANK-MNT changed: jp...@databank.com 20090818 source: LEVEL3 (this means l3 proxy'd in the record, I think... maybe an L3 person can speak to this bit?) > -chris > (being able to validate 'ownership', really authorization to route, > automatically will sure be nice, eh?) >
