Neil, The group is being assembled right now, so we don't have a list as of yet.
-- Jen Sent from my iPhone On Sep 4, 2011, at 11:32 AM, "Neil J. McRae" <n...@domino.org> wrote: > Jen, > What operators are involved? And who represents them specifically? > > Neil. > > On 04/09/2011 16:07, "Jennifer Rexford" <j...@cs.princeton.edu> wrote: >> >> >> As one of the co-chairs of this working group, I'd like to chime in to >> clarify the purpose of this group. Our goal is to assemble a group of >> vendors and operators (not "publish or perish" academics) to discuss and >> recommend effective strategies for incremental deployment of security >> solutions for BGP (e.g., such as the ongoing RPKI and BGP-SEC work). It >> is not to design new security protocols or to "write policy and >> procedures for operators" -- that would of course be over-reaching and >> presumptuous. The goal is specifically to identify strategies for >> incremental deployment of the solutions designed and evaluated by the >> appropriate technical groups (e.g., IETF working groups). And, while the >> SIGCOMM paper you mention is an example of such a strategy, it is just >> one single example -- and is by no means the recommendation of a group >> that is not yet even fully assembled yet. The working group will debate >> and discuss a great many issues before suggesting any strategies, and >> those strategies would be the output of the entire working group. >> >> <tongue in cheek> As for "publish or perish" academics, I doubt you'll >> find that the small set of academics who choose to go knee deep into >> operational issues do so because they are trying to optimize their >> academic careers... ;) </tongue in cheek> >> >> -- Jen >> > >
