Wouldn't it make more sense to filter in bound default? or use a single static default if you where worried about that?
-jim On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Joel Maslak <jmas...@antelope.net> wrote: > Protection against learning a bad default route through whatever routing > protocol they are learning, since these two routes would be more specific > than any typical default route. They probably got burned learning a default > route. > > On Sep 23, 2011, at 7:12 PM, Glen Kent <glen.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have seen a few operators adding static routes like: > > 0.0.0.0/1 some next-hop and > > 128.0.0.0/1 some next-hop. > > > > Why would anyone want to add such static routes? What does 0.0.0.0/1 > > mean. Note that the netmask is 1 and not 0. > > > > Thanks, > > Glen > > > >