I found I had to do this many years ago on some Cisco routers to get them to load balance (per packet) across two links. Adding 0.0.0.0/0 routes across both links just resulted in traffic routing across one link. Broke it into two /1's per link and it worked perfectly.
On 24 September 2011 02:12, Glen Kent <glen.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have seen a few operators adding static routes like: > 0.0.0.0/1 some next-hop and > 128.0.0.0/1 some next-hop. > > Why would anyone want to add such static routes? What does 0.0.0.0/1 > mean. Note that the netmask is 1 and not 0. > > Thanks, > Glen > >