I was told to expect 0.1ms by UBNT. Haven't seen this published, though. Josh
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Dylan Bouterse <dy...@corp.power1.com> wrote: > What published specs have you seen on the airFiber latency? I asked one of > the UBNT guys and they said it's microsecond. On any network I've managed, > anything sub 1ms is acceptable. > > Dylan > > -----Original Message----- > From: John van Oppen [mailto:jvanop...@spectrumnet.us] > Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 2:22 PM > To: 'Andrew McConachie'; Marshall Eubanks > Cc: NANOG list > Subject: RE: airFiber > > We actually have a lot of the old gigabeam radios in service, they are faster > than the published specs of the airfiber links (1G full duplex vs 750 > mbit/sec fd) and lower latency due to their very simplistic design. To be > honest, from a network engineering standpoint, the gigabeams were conveninet > as path issues would show up as ethernet errors that can be used to trigger > reroutes or other events. That being said, we did not have a large variety > of switches as the microwave side of our house is made up entirely of just a > couple of cisco models. The gigabeams also have a pure OOB management > setup. > > > John > >
