----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Peach" <john-na...@johnpeach.com>
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 11:57:38 -0400 (EDT) > Jay Ashworth <j...@baylink.com> wrote: > > SMTP Auth to *arbitrary remote domains' MX servers*? Am I missing > > something, > > or are you? > > I run an MTA on my server and auth to that from laptops and other > clients. Relaying allowed for authorised users. So, in other words, it's ok to rant and stomp our feet about the end-to-end architecture and how critical it is to support in order to diss NAT, but we're required to ignore it when discussing SMTP? I'm not sure I'm following, there. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274
