On 9/4/12 9:05 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "John Peach" <john-na...@johnpeach.com> > >> On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 11:57:38 -0400 (EDT) >> Jay Ashworth <j...@baylink.com> wrote: >>> SMTP Auth to *arbitrary remote domains' MX servers*? Am I missing >>> something, >>> or are you? >> >> I run an MTA on my server and auth to that from laptops and other >> clients. Relaying allowed for authorised users. > > So, in other words, it's ok to rant and stomp our feet about the end-to-end > architecture and how critical it is to support in order to diss NAT, but > we're required to ignore it when discussing SMTP? > > I'm not sure I'm following, there. >
Feelings on spam = "this is why we can't have nice things" ~Seth
