Ahhh. That sucks. I've never put our Zenoss installs through quite that much traffic. That's a shame to hear.
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Jo Rhett <jrh...@netconsonance.com> wrote: > Small shop people wise with millions of customers and tens of thousands of > application and log-derived data sources. We use Zenoss extensively and > mostly we keep having to make decisions what data to pull out of it so it > can function. > > I have previously worked at larger enterprises which had millions of data > sources, and Zenoss couldn't dream of handling that, no matter how much > hardware we threw at it. > > > On Dec 24, 2012, at 10:48 PM, Mike Hale wrote: > > Very small shop with millions of data sources? > > lol? > > > On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Jo Rhett <jrh...@netconsonance.com>wrote: > >> On Dec 20, 2012, at 9:26 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote: >> > Zenoss works very well >> >> Um... you lost me after the first 4 words. Zenoss might work acceptably >> for very, very small organizations with very small amounts of data. Zenoss >> is incapable of scaling to even moderate-sized data sets with tens of >> thousands of data sources, nevermind medium sized data sets with millions >> of data sources. I work at a very small shop with three total engineers and >> Zenoss was unable to scale beyond 1/4 of our data sources with dozens of >> cores and hundreds of gigabytes of RAM on numerous systems. It doesn't >> actually use any of these, the internal deadlocks in the architecture make >> it impossible for it to scale. >> >> That Zenoss might make a better IP management tool than what it is >> purported and sold to do... amuses. >> >> -- >> Jo Rhett >> Net Consonance : net philanthropy to improve open source and internet >> projects. >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 > > > -- > Jo Rhett > Net Consonance : net philanthropy to improve open source and internet > projects. > > > > -- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0